Yesterday I ordered a DeLorme PN-40 SE GPS with Topo USA 7. It should arrive tomorrow. This is significant for me, as I’ve been a Garmin user since I first started using a GPS back in 1995. A friend asked me what GPS receivers I own/have owned and the list I came up with was:
- Garmin GPS 40 (December, 1995)
- Garmin GPS 12
- Garmin GPS 12XL
- Garmin GPS II
- Garmin GPS III
- Garmin GPS III+
- Garmin GPS V
- Garmin eTrex Vista
- Garmin Rino 120
- Garmin GPSMap 60CS (May, 2004)
- Garmin GPSMap 60CSx (January, 2006)
- Bluetooth hockey puck (June 2007)
- Garmin Colorado 400t (January, 2008)
- DeLorme PN-40 SE (December, 2008)
As you can see, I’ve not strayed from Garmin with the exception of a cheap Bluetooth receiver I got for use with my HPC. Why the choice to go with DeLorme and the PN-40?
- As a map kind of guy, I am eager to explore the many map layers (aerial imagery, topo maps, vector data, etc.) that are supported by this unit.
- Even with constant upgrade to the latest technology, I’ve always considered my GPS receivers to be underpowered: slow to redraw, slow to update, etc. The initial reports are that the PN-40 with its dual processors, one dedicated to GPS functions and the other dedicated to display and other user interface functions, flat-out screams.
- Various frustrations with the Garmin Colorado and no indication of solutions on the horizon.
I’ll post an initial review of the PN-40 once I have had a chance to play with it some.
Any preliminary thoughts? I am considering buying one. I am impressed by what I have read about this gps as well as how responsive they are in various forums about the gps.
By: Gary on December 12, 2008
at 10:41 AM